small version of the UGLE crest - top
small version of the UGLE crest - bottom

Pro First Grand Principal's Address at Supreme Grand Chapter of England
on Wednesday, 12th November 2003

Companions, most of you will be aware that a Strategic Working Party which I formed in 2002 has been considering whether the traditional Ceremony of Exaltation and other aspects of the way in which the Royal Arch functions are still appropriate, after some 175 years. As seems almost inevitable in any Masonic context, various rumours have been circulating recently about the findings and recommendations of the Strategic Working Party. I therefore want to spend a few minutes outlining to you exactly what conclusions have been reached and how we propose to deal with them.

Perhaps the first point to cover is why it has seemed necessary to examine the Royal Arch in such detail. It undoubtedly appears to be successful as it stands, with approximately 100,000 members, which is about one-third of the Craft. When one looks below the surface a little, however, it becomes clear that all is not quite what it seems. Many consider that the Royal Arch is the "completion of the Third Degree", but even if this was correct, it is not very satisfactory that two-thirds of our Craft membership do not go on to "complete their Third Degree". Worse still, active participation is far less than the membership figure, and many Chapters are struggling to remain viable in the face of poor attendance. This is not universal, of course, and there are areas around the country where the Royal Arch is very successful - but the overall pattern is not encouraging. At a time when other Orders of Masonry are flourishing as never before, including those which require membership of the Royal Arch as a prerequisite for admission, this suggests that the Order is no longer meeting the needs of the membership as it used to, and as it should.

Details of the proposed changes were sent to Grand Superintendents a few weeks ago, and I am meeting with them this afternoon to hear and discuss their views. What I can tell you now is that the Grand Scribe Ezra has already received some feedback on the ideas, and that this has been almost universally positive. This is not the time and the place to go into the individual details of the proposals, and you will all be given the opportunity of looking at them after we have made any changes that may become necessary as a result of this afternoon's meeting. I believe we should then have a period of several months during which all members of the Royal Arch will have an opportunity to consider these changes and submit comments, preferably through Metropolitan, Provincial and District Grand Scribes Ezra, to help eliminate too much duplication; a Notice of Motion incorporating any amendments will then be brought forward at the next meeting of Supreme Grand Chapter in April, and the substantive motion will then be proposed, and debated as necessary, a year from now. This proposed timetable will allow almost a full year for consideration and consultation. I hope that we can achieve a result which will lead in due time to a significant boost in the popularity of the Royal Arch.

Very few changes are proposed to the actual ceremony of Exaltation: the description of the Royal Arch as a completion of the Master Mason's Degree is to be removed, and the Order will thus be given its own independent status. A short addition will be made, if Grand Lodge approves in December, to the wording known as the Preliminary Declaration which stands at the head of our Book of Constitutions, and this will enable the higher status of the Royal Arch to be more easily compatible with the definition of 'pure, Antient Masonry'. This change will be mandatory in all versions of our ritual, because we cannot have different, and completely contradictory, definitions in different Chapters. It is important that we correct now something which has been logically wrong for nearly two hundred years. It does not befit the importance of the Royal Arch in any way to be identified as an adjunct of another Degree, and it does nothing useful for the Third Degree either to be regarded as in some way incomplete. What we need to concentrate on is the completion of our journey in pure Antient Masonry, and not weaken it with a misunderstanding.
Two other changes are proposed to the actual ceremony; a short addition to the words spoken after the candidate is restored to light, in order to give him more time to comprehend the import of what he sees before him; and the introduction of a brief description of the Reverential or Hailing Sign before the communication of the Word.

One of the elements most commonly identified as a problem for the candidate at the time of his Exaltation is the length and complexity of the three Lectures. Indeed this has led many Chapters to decide not to deliver all three on the same evening, and whether this is done or not, the obscurity of some of the thought, and difficulty of some of the very old-fashioned words, has proved an obstacle to many Principals and candidates alike. The traditional Symbolical and Mystical Lectures have therefore been very substantially rewritten, are now considerably shorter, and much clearer. I would like to stress that the Strategic Working Party has been very sensitive to the need to avoid any suggestion of 'dumbing down' the Lectures, and that the revised versions will still give candidates plenty to think about. In the Mystical Lecture in particular, care has been taken to retain some of the original text which the Strategic Working Party considered, by reason of its importance or simple grandeur, to be essential. Many of those who have already seen the proposed revisions think they are an improvement.

Adoption of the revised Lectures will be discretionary within each Chapter, and Companions will be free to continue with the traditional Lectures if this is preferred. Whether or not the new versions are adopted, however, every candidate will have to be given a new booklet on the night of his Exaltation, prepared and funded centrally, which will include the three traditional Lectures in full, and a guide to their meaning and content. This new guide will not try to explain the Royal Arch, but rather direct the reader's attention to an appreciation of aspects of it, which might otherwise take a long time to acquire. It will be designed to appeal to those with many years' experience as well as those who are newly Exalted. An editorial team of Companions who have studied the Royal Arch for many years is being assembled, and I hope that this initiative will prove to be a popular and helpful innovation.

A few changes to the rules concerning the attachment of Chapters to Lodges are also proposed, but these are, I hope, uncontroversial, and will simplify the process. Of considerably more importance, especially to our younger Brethren, is a proposal to remove the barrier on progression to the Third Principal's Chair for those who are not yet through, or in, the Chair of the Craft. This should not be 'encouraged', in the sense that anyone not yet ready for progression to the Chairs of the Chapter should feel under pressure to do so, but it will help those who are ready and willing to make Masonic advancement but may be, for whatever reason, not yet a Past or ruling Master. The barrier is, after all, artificial, for there is no esoteric knowledge in the Craft Installation required for advancement in the Chapter, and the senior members of each Chapter will still maintain their responsibility for ensuring that those elected to the Chair are ready for that responsibility. The Strategic Working Party, however, feel it is important to satisfy the ambition and interest of our keen young members, and not drive them off to exercise their enthusiasm in other Orders of Masonry, perhaps never to return.

That is all I plan to say now about the changes, Companions. They have been given a great deal of thought over many months, and the process of full consultation will now begin. I believe that they will lead to a greater interest in, and enthusiasm for, the Royal Arch, and I believe that they will make it more attractive to join and more enjoyable for its members.


Copyright 2002: The United Grand Lodge of England
Created by: Mark Griffin and maintained by U.G.L.E.